[This pre-1923 publication has been converted from its original format for republication and may contain occasional defects or omissions from the conversion process and may contain defects from the original publication.] Upshur was elected to a term in the Virginia House of Delegates in 1812, was Commonwealth’s Attorney for Richmond (1816-1823), ran unsuccessfully for the [This pre-1923 publication has been converted from its original format for republication and may contain occasional defects or omissions from the conversion process and may contain defects from the original publication.] Upshur was elected to a term in the Virginia House of Delegates in 1812, was Commonwealth’s Attorney for Richmond (1816-1823), ran unsuccessfully for the U.S. Congress, returned to the legislature from 1825 to 1827, was elected to the Virginia General Court in 1826, and was an influential delegate to the Virginia State Constitutional Convention of 1829-1830.[3][2] Throughout his political career, Upshur was a stalwart conservative and advocate for states’ rights. He opposed democratic reform at the Virginia Convention of 1829-30, and during the nullification movement in South Carolina, he defended the principle of nullification and the state itself in a series of letters entitled “An Exposition of the Virginia Resolutions of 1798”. Upshur’s view of the Constitution received its fullest expression in his 1840 treatise in response to Judge Joseph Story, A Brief Enquiry into the Nature and Character of our Federal Government: Being a Review of Judge Story’s Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States. [117]…more

A Brief Enquiry Into the True Nature and Character of Our Federal Government: Being a Review of Judge Story’s Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, By a Virginian (1840)

A Brief Enquiry Into the True Nature and Character of Our Federal Government: Being a Review of Judge Story’s Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, By a Virginian (1840) PDF

The list of books you might like